Login
Register
Replacing vertically integrated suites of applications is no longer an ideal upgrade path. Modular transformation addresses both network and business needs.
By submitting this form, you acknowledge that your contact information, including email address, will be shared with the sponsor, and consent to TM Forum contacting you by phone or email to fulfill your request and to inform you about appropriate products or services.
Sponsored by:
Full Stack Transformations: Do they work and is there an alternative?
The IT systems that power the businesses of communications service providers (CSPs) have always been subject to regular change. Traditionally this was achieved through a process called “full stack” transformation – replacing complete, vertically integrated suites of applications (or stacks). But there may be a better option. Full stack transformations tend to be complex and unwieldy, so CSPs are seeking alternatives that will help them be more agile. With the advent of decoupled, modular, API-enabled architectures, operators increasingly are choosing to replace only those parts of an application that bring additional business value. This report looks at the pros and cons of full stack transformation and evaluates a modular alternative, with special focus on how TM Forum members are collaborating to create standards and best practices for a modern architecture. Read it to understand:
