Several trends are fueling M&A, including the rollout of 5G and strong interest from private equity buyers as the sector becomes increasingly digital. A recent spate of M&A activity in the telecoms and media sector raises the question of how deals will impact ongoing digital transformation plans.
How will rising M&A impact digital transformation?
Late December and early January saw a spate of mergers, acquisitions and divestments in Asia, Europe and Africa, closing out what PWC describes as a strong year of M&A activity in the media and telecoms sector. PWC expects M&A activity to continue through this year – regulation permitting. For CIOs and CTOs, that will mean looking carefully at how deals impact ongoing digital transformation plans, even if it means mothballing projects.
Several trends are fueling M&A, including the rollout of 5G and strong interest from private equity buyers as the sector becomes increasingly digital, according to PWC. Despite the potential benefits, when it comes to achieving economies of scale deals can hamper digital transformation. “Any M&A activity tends to grab the focus of everyone,” says Lars R. Andersen, freelance CTO/CIO and formerly a CTO/CIO of Telenor Denmark. During mergers, for example, the focus on IT/process integration “can challenge any on-going development efforts, including digital transformation,” he says. Resource constraints, management focus, incompatibility issues and turf wars between systems and people can all pose challenges. “If it is unclear who decides, the turf war stuff may consume focus,” says Andersen. A transaction where the company is kept materially intact, meanwhile, can lead to “a decision vacuum”. “Mergers and acquisitions are just a normal part of business, [but] they definitely can cause great disruption to the plans and workstream underway within both parties,” says the CTO of Intrado, Adan Pope, who has been involved in multiple M&As throughout his career. Among the dangers Pope identifies are ongoing technology duplication and the retention of legacy technology. “We have seen many examples where one company is split from another or acquired by another, and the tech estate looks like the sum of the parts or the difference of the parts,” he says. The inherent complexity of digital transformation when it comes to decision making, architecture and sourcing also means “it has the additional vulnerability of ‘unperceived disruption’, whereby an unintended disruption emerges as problems in programs as much as 1-2 years later,” says Andersen. Given the potential for problems, it is important to carefully review the impact on all larger programs and even consider whether “if it is better to close/suspend [programs and ] revisit after the organization has settled,” says Andersen. “In particular for digital transformation, if there is no clear view of the target IT architecture, [it]…should be established as a new foundation for any digital transformation journey.” Dean Ramsay, principal analyst at TM Forum, points out that using a digital maturity model helps CSPs identify what to keep or lose.
"
CSPs undergoing a merger should
evaluate each party against a digital maturity model to decide which systems and processes should be saved and which should be canned or federated underneath," says Ramsay. "It’s wildly complicated but it’s better than the old way of doing things which was just to keep the whole legacy from both companies."
Pope also stresses the importance of establishing a destination architecture, as well as clearly linking business systems transformations to the product portfolio they serve. “This is extremely important when making priority decisions about the turn down of a system based on the elimination of a redundant service. This is many times the missing link,” explains Pope. “We tend to believe that the service is pure profit once it is mature as we may have fully deployed and depreciated all the assets that constitute it…Unfortunately this is not the full story.” Instead, companies should consider the expense of operating services when calculating their overall profitability. “The product mix should drive the tech debt reduction priorities as well as the enterprise objectives of the CIO/CTO,” says Pope.